Is the government of Venezuela repressing the indigenous community of the Pemones?

Some reports are circulating that the Venezuelan government may be repressing an indigenous community in Santa Elena de Uairén, in southern Venezuela. The authorities are said to have been responsible for the deaths of at least 5 Pemones and several dozen wounded. Based on a chorus of media and NGOs, several opposition leaders have taken this case into their own hands and have already announced that these murders should be considered a “genocide” that could trigger the military intervention of an “international coalition. Should we take all their statements as literally true? An analysis by Alex ANFRUNS.



First, it is important to note that this violent incident took place on the eve of “D-Day” on February 23, when a group of countries under the auspices of the Trump administration organized a mega-concert that served as the backdrop for the delivery of “humanitarian aid” across the Colombian-Venezuelan border.

While Nicolás Maduro’s government rejected the U.S.-led operation as a “tasteless spectacle that offered crumbs to Venezuelans” who are not “beggars” and claimed to want to “defend the sovereignty” of his country, some members of the Pémon community announced that they would protect the convoys entering from across the border with Brazil.


That’s how on 22 February there were clashes between the Bolivarian National Guard (GNB) and a group of Pemones, during which Zoraida García, a Pemón woman, was killed. According to initial reports, the next day the Pemones managed to keep General José Miguel Montoya Rodríguez, considered the main author of this raid, in captivity, and then expelled the GNB officers.

In a video you can see Montoya Rodríguez trying to reassure the Pemones: “You have to say what happened, without hiding anything. We have to say what we have seen, and we have to determine responsibilities no matter where they come from. If I, as an armed force, have abused the use of weapons, I am responsible for that. But if I, as a community (Pemón), was the origin of this incident, it is also necessary to determine responsibility”. The tone and images contradict the headlines of some media that presented the scene as if the Pemones had held the general against his will. (1)

A few days later, the information became clearer: several opposition deputies recognized that the ones who shot the Indians were not soldiers of the Bolivarian National Guard, but “people brought by the government to repress”. Congressman Guzamana says they documented the arrival of several buses with the perpetrators of the crime, that have resulted in “25 dead”, which he hastily described as “genocide” and that he would denounce it before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. (2) Another congresswoman explained that the killers were “prisoners who were deliberately released” by the government.


This double testimony confirms an essential point: the violence was not generated by the repression of the military. It is true that, given the lack of official information available, since it is a remote place, this tragic event was particularly confusing. On the other hand, instead of respecting the truth about the circumstances of the dead by allowing the authorities to do their job, these opposition deputies have used them for their own purposes and called on foreign states to ensure justice.


Maduro, a new “Conqueror”?


After the confirmation of the death of Kliber Pérez, a young Pemón who worked as a guide, images of Indians surrounded by a halo of purity referred to the Garden of Eden multiplied on social networks on February 28 to create a story that presents the government as that of the new “Conquerors”. They are often accompanied by messages asking “President” Guaidó to “fulfill his supposed mandate to open a humanitarian corridor by means of international military intervention, in accordance with Article 187 of the Constitution, approved by the Supreme Court of Justice.

On the same day, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (a Washington-based body of the Organization of American States (OAS), whose Secretary General has shown significant activism against Venezuela for years) responded to the request of the NGO Foro Penal by granting “protective measures” to members of the Pemón community. (3) Opponents broadcast a video showing how some of the Pemones allegedly crossed the border into Paracaima, Brazil, where they allegedly “applied to the UNHCR and the Brazilian government for refugee status.


During the night of February 28 to March 1, a group of Pemones appeared to have started a series of fires, including one on a bridge to “impede access to collectives” (Chavista militants allegedly responsible for violent actions and/or intimidation) who were accused of acting as accomplices to the armed forces. A few days earlier, Montoya was replaced by General Alirio Cruz Ortega, which was used by the opposition to question Montoya’s responsibility.

However, one observation must be made: the Pemones who participated in the confrontation with government authorities did so in a personal capacity, not as representatives of the Pemón People. In fact, at the beginning of February, the Council of the General Chiefs of the Pemón People had pronounced on the current political crisis. It was sending a message of calm:

“Our position on the current situation in the country (humanitarian aid): the Council of General Chiefs of the Pemón People in the General Assembly has adopted an impartial position on this situation to avoid confrontation between indigenous brothers, so these are disputed powers that must resolve without generalizing the participation of the Pemón people. It is also decided that any person who decides to participate in the humanitarian aid activity should do so under his own responsibility and in a personal capacity, without using the name of an entire people who have decided not to participate by majority. The mayor of Gran Sabana, Emilio González, and the Venezuelan opposition are invited not to use the struggle of the indigenous movement as part of their political program; after this Assembly, all partisan political activities carried out outside the decisions of the majorities of this General Assembly will be considered a violation of the self-determination of our people. The sectors of Uriman, Kamarata, Kawanayen, Santa Elena, Ikabaru and Wonken, most of which are present at the General Assembly, have decided to take an impartial stand against the alleged humanitarian aid; only the community leaders of Manakru (Santa Elena #6) and Kumarakapai (Kawanayen Sector #5) will accompany the mayor and his political party under their responsibility and, therefore, will be the only ones to assume the consequences that such a situation may entail. » (4)


Assembly of the Council of the General Caciques of the Pemón People


But starting on February 22, there was a demonstration with posters with the slogan “Guaidó Presidente” and “Kumarakapay contra Maduro” (Kumarakapay against Maduro). The dead were quickly taken up as a sectarian political cause, when the exact circumstances of this violence, which could be one more provocation, have not yet been clarified. Consequently, the instrumentalization of this “Indian rebellion” by the right-wing opposition seems obvious.

On the weekend of February 23 and 24, the Minister of Indigenous Peoples of the Venezuelan government, Aloha Núñez, visited the site in Santa Elena de Uairén. It is important to listen to her version :”(We went there) to defend national sovereignty and our border. We have seen the presence of violent groups committed by extreme right-wing sectors to burn buses, attack the troops of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces (FANB) and disrupt public order, events that we firmly reject. We condemn these acts of violence financed by the Mayor of the Gran Sabana.

While the opposition reports a “declaration of resistance and disobedience to the regime,” it must be remembered that the dispute between the Pemones and the government is not new. Therefore, it is logical that the political opposition, which considers the constitutional president a “usurper”, should try  to make the most of this case.



The Pemón people, hostage of natural resources



In early December 2018, the death of another member of this community set fire to the gunpowder. A group of Pemones then attacked the military, accusing them of disguising themselves as tourists in order to expel them from their own territory and take control of the mining resources. In fact, the region’s economy is based on tourism, on the one hand, and mining, on the other. In other words, it is a backdrop for all kinds of greed, so mistrust and incidents have been on the rise for years.

The death of the young tourist guide Kliber Pérez provoked the reaction of the Council of the General Chiefs of the Pemón People, who called: “We call upon the indigenous and non-indigenous political groups that in recent days have tried to slander, speculate and unhealthily politicize the process of investigation in order to obtain a political advantage, to refrain from doing so out of respect for the pain of the families and of all the Pemón people. (5)

Who wants to fan the flames? For years, the opposition has pointed the finger at the Venezuelan government for wanting to develop gold mining with its Arco Minero del Orinoco project (6). Meanwhile, several Indian communities, including the Pemón, cooperate with employers who carry out illegal mining activities, pollute watercourses and poison the inhabitants. (7)

To overcome what environmentalists have denounced as an “ecocide”, the government has entrusted the Venezuelan army, through Plan Caura (8), with the monitoring of the Natural Park, in charge of protecting strategic areas for mining. But the presence of the army is perceived as hostile by these communities, which enjoy an autonomous status in their territory.




What development model?


It is also important to consider the situation from a historical perspective. Venezuela has riches such as oil, gold, coltan and an aquifer reserve, and its economic development model has been based essentially on income from the export of these raw materials, integrated into the capitalist world economy. However, the necessary fight against corruption, as well as the fight for a more equitable economic model, will not come from a deadly foreign intervention that results in balkanization or the creation of new states.

The current context of heightened tensions aims to provoke hysteria with every incident that occurs, forgetting the essential United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development, which affirms “the right of peoples to exercise full and complete sovereignty over their natural wealth and resources”. States have the right and the duty to formulate appropriate national development policies aimed at continuously improving the well-being of all people and all individuals, on the basis of their active, free and meaningful participation in development and the equitable distribution of the benefits derived therefrom. (9)

It is this right that the United States wants to attack, using for this purpose the Venezuelan opposition, which has already demonstrated how unscrupulous they are. Is the US trying to set the Amazon on fire with this spark?


Notes :

  1. De Grazia: Pemones mantienen retenido a general de la GNB, El Nacional, 23 february 2019
  2. Diputado Guzamana presume 25 indígenas muertos a manos de la FAN, NTN, 27 february 2019
  3. CIDH solicita a Venezuela adoptar medidas de protección para indígenas Pemón y un defensor indígena baré, 1 march 2019 :
  4. Communiqué Officiel du Conseil de Caciques Généraux du Peuple Pémon suite aux conclusions du Congrès Pémon du 18-20 Février 2019 :
  5. 3ème Communiqué Officiel du Conseil de Caciques Généraux du Peuple Pémon à propos des faits survenus à Canaima le 8/12 :
  6. Maurice Lemoine; L’Arc minier de l’Orénoque, les « écologistes » et les mafias, Medelu, 11 april 2018
  7. La Contaminación por mercurio en la Guayana Venezolana: Una propuesta para el diálogo, Red Ara 2013
  8. Plan Caura busca frenar minería ilegal en la amazonía venezolana, TeleSUR, 4 may 2010
  9. Déclaration du droit au développement des Nations Unies :